ixxie
Joined 9 years ago
Joined 9 years ago
If automated pentesting in PR review CI pipeline will become table stakes - which is very plausible - maybe the OP has a point.
Admittedly, this doesn't end up being great, but it seems hard to solve this well in other ways, as much as I wish I could write SQL and get types for free.
I think we need a "middle path" culture that finds a good balance between these pressures and values.
I'm curious if you think cooperative businesses leveraging non-voting preferred shares, community shares and other coop investment instruments are more resilient against this type of corruption.
I'm wonder how you see the tradeoffs these models have against traditional LLC/VC models and how you would mitigate them.
-----
OpenCode
4.9k issues 1.7k PRs 158k stars
https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode
-----
Pi
31 issues 4 PRs 47k stars
https://github.com/badlogic/pi-mono
Their secret? A very rigorous contribution policy. Essentially, issues and PRs are autoclosed, and reviewed daily by the team. If its not slop, they whitelist either the issue/PR or the contributor (so their stuff isn't autoclosed next time).
https://github.com/badlogic/pi-mono/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.m...
GitHub needs an issue / PR approval flow.
A bimodal strategy gets you the best of both worlds: the ability to rapidly explore and develop ideas, and the ability to critically and cautiously assess them.
Diversity fuels evolution.
On the corporate scale, see the whole carbon / ESG / impact measure ent industry. Lifecycle Analysis, supply chain extrapolation, Bill of Materials analysis.
You only get some relatively crude estimate and a lot of missing data points, whereas economic growth can conveniently assign a dollar value on everything.
I think it only gets worse as you scale up.
UX wise, not really a revolution.
Please learn from Zen Browser.
Coming from a new-pragmatist orientation, this is a nice invitation to look more carefully at phenomological takes.
More please!
Socials: - discord:ixxie
Interests: Product, Engineering, Design, Philosophy, Cooperatives
---