itsprofitbaron
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
http://news.microsoft.com/2016/06/13/microsoft-to-acquire-li...
Eloqua - Founded: 1999, IPO: 2012. Years to IPO: 13
Qualys - Founded: 1999, IPO: 2012. Years to IPO: 13
Rally Software - Founded: 2001, IPO: 2013. Years to IPO: 12
E2open - Founded: 2000, IPO: 2012. Years to IPO: 12
Exact Target - Founded: 2000, IPO 2012. Years to IPO: 12
Box (Summer IPO) - Founded: 2005, IPO: 2014. Years to IPO: 9
Demandware - Founded: 2004, IPO: 2012. Years to IPO: 8
Fleetmatics - Founded: 2004, IPO: 2012. Years to IPO: 8
ServiceNow - Founded: 2004, IPO: 2012. Years to IPO: 8
Bazaarvoice - Founded: 2005, IPO: 2013. Years to IPO - 7
Workday - Founded: 2005, IPO: 2012. Years to IPO: 7
Marin Software - Founded: 2006, IPO: 2013. Years to IPO: 7
Marketo - Founded: 2006, IPO: 2013. Years to IPO: 7
As part of the Open Connect Project, Netflix has deployed servers which are hundreds of terabytes in size in strategic locations all over the work and they contain ~60-90% of the data required for that particular country.
These devices either live in the ISP (which is what Netflix wanted to happen with Comcast) or live in an internet exchange where multiple ISPs can connect to the Open Connect devices.
There are 3 core benefits in doing this:
- Better Streaming due to fewer hops to the client
- Netflix avoids rate limiting (if they're inside the ISP Network)
- Peering is free (usually) and is essentially where two ISPs connect their infastructure and agree to maintain their own sites without bandwidth charges. It's common throughout the industry and content-providers are always looking to peer with ISPs to drive down their overall costs of operations.
Q: Have there been any startups you've later regretted rejecting from YCombinator? A: Sure, several. But I can't name names because it's not for me to disclose that they applied.
Additionally they also mention about contacting them on rejected applications[2]:
"If you do, we'd appreciate it if you'd send us an email telling us about it; we want to learn from our mistakes"
Here are some that are known to have been rejected by YC and have gone onto raise funding (which is not a perfect metric by any means since funding ≠ success) or have been acquired:
- SendGrid - http://sendgrid.com/ - Raised $27.4M[3]
- CouchOne - http://www.couchbase.com/ - Raised $56M[4]
- AfterTheDeadline - http://afterthedeadline.com/ - Acquired By Automattic
- LightSail Energy - http://lightsailenergy.com/ - Raised $42.8M[5]
- SignPost - http://www.signpost.com/ - Raised $15M[6]
- Storenvy - http://www.storenvy.com - although they were kicked out of YC[7] Raised $6.5M [8]
[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20120814111130/http://askolo.com...
[2] http://ycuniverse.com/yc-applying-interviewees
[3] http://www.crunchbase.com/company/sendgrid
[4] http://www.crunchbase.com/company/couchbase
[5] http://www.crunchbase.com/company/lightsail-energy
[6] http://www.crunchbase.com/company/signpost
[7] http://joncrawford.com/post/20378314843/how-i-got-kicked-out...
[8] http://techcrunch.com/2013/02/12/storenvy-goes-from-getting-...
The "divorce" left Kara/Walt with the writers (as they were employed by them) and WSJ/Dow Jones/NewsCorp the AllThingsD brand, website and conference business. However, it appears the AllThingsD site is being completely shut down and redirected to http://wsj.com/tech - probably because NewsCorp who struck the original deal with Kara/Walt don't want a situation like this to happen again.
Recode is a completely new business (site and conference business; WSJ/NewsCorp/Dow Jones still owns the D Conference) albeit with the same writers from AllThingsD.
How is that not fair?
"My personal belief is that, devaluing the site for the BRAND term e.g. [rap genius] actually devalues Google's quality. On the other side of the coin, if someone searches for [X rap genius] whilst they are under penalty its fair that they do not rank for that either. However, there are obvious reasons as to why the search quality team have decided to do this." If anything, I think google is too soft on people attempting to cheat them.
Google's Search Quality Team are actually pretty strict in terms of reviewing the reconsideration request and if the site has previously had a penalty they pay extra attention to the cleanup.However, they're acceptable if they do not carry any link equity (aka. use the no follow tag) on the link.
[1] https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/66356
[2] https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/35769?hl=en
However, Google over the years have also worked on their international/localisation identification of sites. As a result they allow webmasters to geotarget them within WMTs[2] which seems to resolve the Reddit issue.
Having said that, there are other methods to fix the issue as well such as using the geotarget option within WMTs to using the rel alternate tag etc.
[1] http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.co.uk/2010/03/working...
@profitbaron