itkovian_
Joined 2 years ago
Joined 2 years ago
- the primary experiments are on small policy networks - they are compressed dynamic system models. The observation and action space can be read off. It’s not surprising to me that these types of networks can be used to identify the env they were trained on
- the exps on actual llms remove looping behaviour and that’s it - from article “but it could not add an ability the model lacked”
I’d say this is fortunate because if llms could do the latter, rsi would be immediate. It may be possible we simply need bigger and better edit models, but at least from the experiments there doesn’t seem to be any indication that is imminently about to work.
Conceptually incredibly interesting non the less.
For now we have a great situation with the open weights, but there is absolutely no guarantee that continues, and more the opposite- they may stop.
The world is extremely compute constrained currently, like extremely.
Maybe one argument could be there’s very little value added services required over the raw compute in this new world, and they’re structurally setup to capitalise on that whereas hyperscalars are not.
It’s a good point and not exactly made subtly but seems completely lost on most comments here.