istinetz

For a defense project we're working on, we basically have a hard requirement to use european cloud provider + european llm

We cannot use open source LLMs on-prem, I asked. So that's basically a hard requirement to use mistral, even though Chinese models are strictly better on every dimension.

> journalists

> professional ethics to uphold

very neat!

how do you combat silent failures?

for example, I am scraping website A, getting 500+ pdf files; then they change their layout, the ETL breaks, we autoregenerate it with Claude, but then we get only 450 PDFs. The orchestrator still marks it as a successful run, but we get only part of the data.

Or: the ETL for website B breaks. We use our agentic solution, we successfully repair it, and it completes without errors, but we start missing a few fields that were moved in another sub-page.

Did you encounter any such issues?

this is very cool! I love how responsive the interface is.

judging by his name, he is perhaps in Sofia. I am also living here, and can confirm that many middle class people order groceries online.

>It’s also where furkan gets pretty much all his content, before it gets paywalled.

Who/what is Furkan?

Ok, if you're just using the lichess puzzles and stockfish, why wouldn't I just go to lichess?

yep, the lichess algorithm for finding puzzles from real games is way more sophisticated than this, and they find some really weird bugs

feedback - I tried the puzzles. 1) they all seem trivial and don't escalate in difficulty fast enough 2) I got stuck on the 14th - I'm making the correct move, but nothing happens. I'm not wrong, but even if I were wrong, the website ought to have some feedback to show me my move is wrong, or an option to give up.

If you don't want your opinion to be critiqued, you can simply not post.

Dude?

I have literally seen EU institutions fragrantly break GDPR

>Implying the Eu will actually do anything at all whatsoever upon reporting a gdpr issue

>Money is something VCs “print” and manipulate.

You wot m8

There is a slight difference between glasses and hiring someone actually disabled - blind, deaf, can't do physical labor, autistic, etc.

Yes, you can try to assert fuzzy boundaries, but that doesn't mean that the thing we're pointing to doesn't exist. There are actually plenty of people that cannot do plenty of jobs.

Nobody minds hiring a software dev with a wheelchair or a person wearing glasses. This is not objectionable. Your proposed way to view this dilemma has to also be able to address the more problematic cases - what happens with an Amazon worker who can't stand up for longer periods of time? Or a blind person applying to be a QA?