isbwkisbakadqv

That’s not accurate in the case of osteopenia. It’s defined by a T score. The quantile of the distribution of bone density measurements of young, healthy people that matched the bone density of this patient. Treatments for osteopenia are basically making sure you’re getting enough calcium, vitaD, and high impact exercise…if everyone did all those things (and they worked), the rate of osteopenia would drop to zero.

I really want to learn eMacs but most of my work is in Jupiter notebooks in terra.bio - can eMacs interact with that?

Is one month really enough data to distinguish signal from noise?

2.8% doesn’t seem that crazy to me? Don’t we target like 2-2.5?

How do you think developing counties come up with their poverty lines? This new international number is just the median of those…

I think the goal is to understand someone else’s situation

Was the politician suggesting everyone should do those things or just observing one way to do things?

Right to someone else’s blood supply via placenta?

I guess I forgot to directly respond - point I was trying to make is that I don’t find this insane.

It’s a question of values. I’m happy to pay taxes because my vision for how the world should work includes people who are thriving (like me) helping those who aren’t. Same reason I’m happy to get vaccines even if they don’t help me much (though most, maybe all, are worth it even if I only care about myself).

What do you mean by the “$100k parking spaces” bit?

What fraction of the people who could benefit from LASIK get it? Would you be okay if cancer worker like that?

Interesting idea - where do you hear this?

I’m not sure I fully agree but I like it

this doesn't sound right...but I don't know enough about etymology to dispute it