impute
Joined 5 years ago
Karma
47
Submissions
34
Member since
May 11
Joined 5 years ago
The key is to keep data on how long past projects actually took (which not a lot of organizations do). But once you have that real data, you can understand all the unknown unknowns that came up and assume that similar things will come up on the new project.
Note - I don't agree with it but I think this is the logic the current administration is using.
This seems to be the key part. There's research that shows that relationships are built via multiple, random encounters. Do you think he still would have dropped by your office if you hadn't had these run ins?
Do people writing this type of copy actually believe this?