Recent submissions

Comment · 2 months ago
People do the same. Everybody learns from what was there before and then added or changed things. No difference.
Comment · 3 months ago
I've seen lots of code that people have maintained for 20 years and its full of these duplication and worse. In fact I'm sad to say that majority of code I've seen people write and maintain is worse than what LLMs produce today. Often it is inexperience, sometimes it is willful negligence, but most often it is just tight deadlines and pressure to do finish whatever is being done right now. People know how to do it better, but nobody got the time and budget to actually do it. LLMs also learned from that.
Comment · 4 months ago
I think a lot of people here have either not read the article fully or are misapprehending it.

Neither this author nor most other sane people I know claim that the code or architecture these "loops" produce is great. In fact, the author explains how it is not great. His point is rather, that we'll increasingly see a world in which code quality and maintainability by humans will cease to matter for a lot of codebases.

There might be many software companies in the future which successfully sell software products which were created without a single software developer being involved in its development or maintenance. The code might be bloated and bad - but it doesn't matter because machines can still create and maintain it cheaper and faster than people can.

I already see this happening at a small scale at the place where I work. Product managers with zero coding ability are attempting to create entire new product features on their own using Claude or Codex. We do not let them merge this stuff unsupervised but in some corners and in new repositories they are publishing stuff that they have barely spoken about with a developer. They are just doing it. We'll see more of that.

Comment · 4 months ago
Phew .... I saw the title and thought this was some horrid LinkedIn post from a "Founder" dad about teaching his kids how to pitch their startup to investors ...

Luckily it's not about that!

Comment · 6 months ago
Installation of software has usually become simple and easy enough that I feel more safe if i just look it up on the official source and run some curl or package manager command to get it installed. I trust that more than letting an LLM figure it out and then having to worry that I it got hijackeed and installs something based on out-dated or wrong info.

But configuring / setting up complex pieces of technology is something in which I let LLMs help me regularly. I'm happy that I don't have to RTFM that much anymore to get something done. And yes, I'd hate to figure out IAM policies myself or decipher a truckload of error message of third-party systems by myself.

So, yes, I expect LLM help with these kind of things is going to become the norm.

For an LLM to work well, the installer should still exist, the UX should also be kind of self-explanatory and the error message must also have relevant and clear info.

So in that regard, not much has changed.

Comment · 6 months ago
I and everybody else here call BS on that. People make mistakes all the time. Arguably at similar or worse rates.
Comment · 8 months ago
Intelligent people tend to reproduce a lot less than other people. You wanna be average (or slightly above) for the best chance at successful procreation. And hyper-intelligent people are especially bad at procreation.
Comment · 8 months ago
It's not really about the implementation of Java (might be bad, I don't know). It is the specification.

- People talked about null being an issues and that is a big one.

- The entire idea of OOP extremism Java implemented was a mistake - though just a consequence of the time it was born in. Much has been written about this topic by many people.

- Lacking facilities and really design for generic programming (also related to the OOP extremism and null issue

So much more more you can find out with Google or any LLM

Comment · 9 months ago
Especially since the US is not going to have any allies anymore soon.
Comment · 9 months ago
I'm a big fan of high-level languages and abstractions. I'm just not a fan of bad abstractions.
Comment · 9 months ago
I think we are just used to it. Like we are used to so many suboptimal solutions in our professional and personal lives.

I mean, look something like C++ or the name "std::vector" specifically. There are probably 4 Trillion LoC containing this code out there - in production. I'm used to it, doesn't make it good.

Comment · 9 months ago
Comment · 9 months ago
I'm hoping for a future in which humankind looks back with embarrassment at this silly period in its history in which people used to think a leaky and bad abstractions like garbage collection was ever a good approach to deal with resource life-times.
Comment · 9 months ago
I do not know the guy, and I do not care who he is. This really is not "slop". I can attest to the validity of almost all of his points based on my own career. And even if he used ChatGPT assistance to help with the writing, the content clearly was not invented by ChatGPT. This is valuable advice for people in our industry.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton