ictebres
Joined 12 years ago
Joined 12 years ago
I think we should focus our energy more on the question how we can provide everyone according to their needs than how utilizable they are, if we want to live in a more healthy and thriving society than we currently do! At the end there is really no need to give some people 10 times more just because they are productive in a certain way. And this calculation already fails as soon as we add more dimension to it, e.g. someone might not be producing 10 times more productive code but maybe they do offer a lot of social skills that make everyone in the team have a better time during work hours.
The fact that Pfizer can spin this story on their name is disturbing and dangeruous behaviour that should not be the norm.
I worked at retail (Uniqlo to be specific) and it was definetely a rule to not do this. They wanted us to scan everything one by one even if they were the same color and size. This allowed for a pretty accurate information on stock, e.g. we could see how many of a given sweater in given size and color is still in storage etc.
Probably this is too tedius for some retail (groceries with very small unit price) but very smart rule in general.
[1]: https://www.fastcompany.com/40491939/netflix-ceo-reed-hastin...
edit for possible misunderstanding that I'm critisizing the OP
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queer
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queer_heterosexuality
Edit: formatting
https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied-palestinian-territory/....