ibrarmalik

By output you mean the extracted surface geometry? Or are you directly rendering NeRFs in VR.

tmux works out of the box for me.

I tried Zellij and couldn’t get the Alt key to work on mac. And then when ssh’ing into a server I couldn’t see some of the icons because it required a special patched font.

I’m assuming this is taking that into account. Otherwise why would it compute a route?

You’re under the right paper for doing this. Instead of one big model, they have several smaller ones for regions in the scene. This way rendering is fast for large scenes.

This is similar to Block-NeRF [0], in their project page they show some videos of what you’re asking.

As for an easy way of doing this, nothing out-of-the-box. You can keep an eye on nerfstudio [1], and if you feel brave you could implement this paper and make a PR!

[0] https://waymo.com/intl/es/research/block-nerf/

[1] https://github.com/nerfstudio-project/nerfstudio

The Luma folks made something similar: https://apps.apple.com/app/luma-flythroughs/id6450376609?l=e...

The new models and data would stay at OpenAI. You can have thousands of researchers and compute, but if you don’t have “it”, you are behind (ask Google).

In Microsoft he still has access to the models, and that’s all he needs to execute his ideas.

Also https://x.org

Same. I like it better than the vscode vim emulation, which is more “strict” and turns to the visual mode when selecting anything with the cursor. Which I personally think is the worse part of vim.

Where does the model come from? Hard to trust the license when we have no idea with what data it has been trained.

I think people are smart enough to receive extra information and do whatever they want with that.

Its a good narrative to have as you prepare for layoffs.

I used to love pacman, but I never used Arch professionally so I can imagine it can have its share of problems.

Or practical vs. philosophical.