ianhanschen

bubble-ass headline

Wikipedia English also appears to be down.

Please read his books.

"Workspace is written from scratch. Some WindowMaker code is a part of Workspace (as well as configuration defaults) to provide window management functions. The code is tightly coupled with Workspace to provide seamless intergation. Configurable parameters of the integrated WindowMaker are spread across Workspace's Preferences and Preferences application."

Can you call it Itanic if it was around for more than a decade because of how well it sold and how many supercomputers chose to use it? I am familiar with the pain of Itanium, and I understand how hard it was to work with. I've kernel debugged an operating system on it. Yet it was still successful enough to be around for this long. I wouldn't call it "Itanic."

The amount of effort put into this rebuttal is why I try hard to avoid reading the comments here.

I use operating system memory paging as an analogy for this: you paged it back in.

Really surprised the article didn't mention the practice of money laundering.

Barely mentioned, and the author makes us all die inside when they say "Too bad it was written for a whole different architecture and compiler so there is really no easy way for me to find out what it did."

Why not make a blog post instead of an emoji-laden Twitter thread?