iMerNibor
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
This always confuses me - don't people want their computations to run as fast as possible and thus inevitably produce more heat that needs to be vented?
I suppose sometimes it is just an analogy for "its utilizing 100% of my resources" (which I'm guessing it is here), but I've definitely had people say it as an actual complaint in different contexts
Not sure how attached these sites are to their specific brand/domain (or if this is indirect where main sites link to other sites that host the video)
The preview is 530x300px on a 1920x1080 screen vs the image shown being 336x188px
How this passed any sort of QA is beyond me
What should we call this.. mmh..
"Do Not Track" is a bit long, maybe we just shorten it to DNT?
Nah thats dumb. /s
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/DN...
> Unity has a package called Entities Graphics, but surprisingly Cities: Skylines 2 doesn’t seem to use that. The reason might be its relative immaturity and its limited set of supported rendering features
I'd hazard a guess their implementation of whatever bridge between ECS and rendering is not capable of LODs currently (for whatever reason). I doubt they simply forgot to slap on the standard Unity component for LODs during development, there's got to be a bigger roadblock here
Edit: The non-presence of lod'ed models in the build does not necessarily mean they don't exist. Unity builds will usually not include assets that aren't referenced, so they may well exists, just waiting to be used.
Exactly.
If unity actually delivered a workable graphics pipeline (for the DOTS/ECS stack, or at all keeping up with what UE seems to be doing) these things probably wouldn't be an issue.
user installs the game on their pc? unity wants the fee paid for that
same user installs it on their laptop? pay again
same user upgrades their pc and has to install the game again? unity wants their install fee
I believe they also initially said that deinstall + install would incur another charge, but backpeddalled there (weird)
The article you linked covers this as well:
> while more than 1 million of their premises are also being served by “full fibre” FTTP using the older Radio Frequency over Glass (RFoG) approach to ensure compatibility between both sides of their network.
As for them going symmetric in the future: I'll believe it when they do, not holding my breath
You'd also want to calibrate your monitor accordingly of course