iLoveOncall

Why are russian bots always so easy to spot?

Seems pretty obvious to me that it's not going to be 80 academics debating everything under the sun, but instead dedicated groups focusing on their expertise area...

It doesn't matter but CEOs are dumb fucks. Ask this guy how HE uses AI and you'll see he most likely doesn't. They don't understand how anything their company develops works.

Usually that would be fine if reporting lines were healthy, but in the AI age with top-down mandates they're not.

Just don't. Resin printers are a pain. Get an FDM (filament) printer first.

It's just a very bad picture, but every detail is perfectly coherent, it's not AI generated.

Still a baffling choice.

> To be fair, the metaphor breaks down here.

> In research the private track and the bike used are not relevant, the result is what's relevant to be opened for review and scrutiny (which OpenAI does).

Except this is not about research, it's about marketing. OpenAI claims the discoveries were made by their models to show their capabilities, so in fact the HOW is the only important thing here.

It's even worse than this. They're announcing their achievement in bicycle racing, achieved on a private track that nobody can audit, using supposedly a bike that nobody has seen before.

We know OpenAI is recruiting researchers in domains that have nothing to do with the development of AI. IMO the sole purpose is for them to work on research that can then be attributed to OpenAI's models.

> The thing to be remember about those companies you listed, none of them are software companies like Anthropic is.

Yes exactly, that's why I listed them. It's much easier for them to capture a higher revenue compared to software companies, and OP (and Amodei) want to make us believe an AI company could ever reach that revenue.

Compute is by far not the only cost associated with running a service, so, no?

Employers are reducing AI spending, not increasing it.

You're also assuming that basically the entirety of the market would go to Anthropic, rather than other providers, which makes no sense.

You are vastly over-estimating the market for AI. The extreme majority of people would never pay a dime for it.

> If the party continues, they'll go from $50b in revenue to $500b and be fine.

You really have to be insane to think that an AI company will ever reach $500B in revenue. That's almost the same as (2025) Amazon, Walmart, etc., companies with a MUCH wider market.

It is MORE than Apple, it's 5 times more than NVidia even. There is absolutely no software seller that is even remotely close to $500B in revenue.

Absolutely ridiculous.

Revenue is not profit?

Both Anthropic and OpenAI are marketing companies, not AI companies.

Except Scam Altman has stolen from literally everyone to train his models.