hyhconito

He's referring to specific uses of technology as in AI, not the summary headline The Grauniad used. That my nature excludes 99.99% of everything that goes boom at the moment.

Well within the constraints they set out which exclude a hell of a lot of European companies.

(I am in Europe for reference, this is not an external perspective)

Opt in you mean, like the cookie banners?

Oh no that'll never happen because VW are a European company and the money is in fining US tech companies!

Hinton is a complete banana. If anything, we'll do it without technology.

No you couldn't. Totally different domain.

You sound like the guy I just had to fire after blowing his toes off several times.

If you think you are obsolete or faster than anyone else with these tools then you only naive enough to have lost your objectivity to the marketing. I deal with real risk and failures from the output of ChatGPT which have serious financial consequences. The first victim is always the developer, then the tester.

At best, it is very good at ousting people who shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a damn computer.

You're still doing it the hard way. I just use Handbrake.

Pick a hammer, not a shitty hammer factory to assemble bits of hammer.

Nailed it.

Monkey as a synonym of a completely fungible creature.

That too.

JSON has never been better than XML. People are just terrible at XML and don't want to learn.

Yep. Everything is exactly two models away. It's the new fusion. Yet after $X billion expenditure I still have to argue with the finest turd squeezed out of the industry over simple things that a trained monkey could work out.

The whole thing is propped up on faith, hype and investment capital. Now I work in the latter and we're not impressed.

Edit: As for X, removing it from my existence was an improvement in mental health for sure.

Oh yeah been there too. Imagine the day you could beam them out!

Because JSON is fucking horrible for humans?

If there's anything I want to read it's searchable paper.