Recent submissions

Comment · 22 days ago
Comment · 1 month ago
I thought I'd share a more positive comment. I work on a tool in a similar area (moving stuff around) but on a higher level. I currently use rsync or rclone for the file moving parts. So to me your tool looks interesting and promising, thanks for sharing it :)

Some suggestions for improvement for your website/Github:

- I wanted to understand how it differs from rsync. A comparison page would be helpful.

- A comparison to rclone would also be interesting, as it also uses multiple parallel connections.

- As it target more advanced users I think it would be helpful to provide more advanced technical insights on how your transfers exactly work. Also how are edge cases handled, what tests are done? Moving and copying files is critical, and you need to inspire trust in your project among users.

Comment · 8 months ago
Comment · 11 months ago
Netflix could also use or provide their own TV/movie productions as training data.
Comment · 12 years ago
Thanks for the feedback, now the load time feels a bit faster. But in my opinion the overall experience could be a bit snappier. If I notice anything else I will let you know.
Comment · 12 years ago
Interesting project, the user interface looks very nice and polished. But the access from Germany (Europe) is very slow which makes the IDE very unresponsive and tedious to work with.
Comment · 13 years ago
Shouldn't be that hard. You just need to encode the data in JSON and BASE64 and add it as HTTP header. Just look at the existing libraries, they don't seem to be that complicated.
Comment · 13 years ago
Comment · 13 years ago
Comment · 14 years ago
Nice little promotion video for an interesting project.

But one thing looks a bit odd to me, it's that she sits there alone behind the guys ;)

It would probably look better if they used a bigger sofa where she could sit next to them.

Comment · 14 years ago
Okay, I agree these actually are good use cases ;)

And thank you for contributing the module as open source.

Comment · 14 years ago
Yes, I know. If they implement it properly it's alright.

But my concern is that a it might get a security vulnerability when a nifty hacker finds a way to automatically submit the SMS.

And in my opinion omitting the feature is the best way to avoid that problem.

Comment · 14 years ago
Comment · 14 years ago
Is it really so bad that this SMS URI scheme wasn't implemented?

To me it looks like another potential security vulnerability that could be abused by malicious websites.

Therefore I'm quite happy that this "feature" is missing ;)

Comment · 14 years ago
That actually makes sense in German, it means something like "data ride".

But as I saw it first I didn't notice the similarity to the German words. I somehow thought it's a reference to South Park ;)

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton