hugh3
Joined 16 years ago
Joined 16 years ago
First off, "obligated" isn't a word. The word is "obliged".
Secondly, what do you mean "they should"? They already do. It's the number one move in the left-wing activist's playbook -- provoke the police until they use force, and then go play the victim card to the media.
Blame for the widespread nature of this tactic belongs partly with the protestors, and partly with the media who go along with it. Sensible people should reject this game, because it just makes life worse for everybody.
You got pepper-sprayed? Diddums, mate, that's exactly what you wanted to happen.
The Tea Party proved that you can have a mass protest movement that doesn't get in the way of others, and doesn't break the law. Unfortunately it also proved that a nonviolent protest needs to be ten times larger than a violent protest in order to get the same amount of media attention.
lolwut? UC Davis has its own police force.
I would really need to sit down and read the paper carefully (as well as Motl's rebuttal) before I can have a more informed opinion than that, though.
These kids, though, don't seem to be acting like it. They think they're playing a game.
I'm interested in pictures of cute cats and big tits, as well, but they're not suitable subjects for this site either.
I'm really sick of this game, though. The game where protestors deliberately work as hard as they possibly can in order to provoke a police response, and then whine about the police response. This is a game the police can't possibly win, and the protestors know it; that's why they play it. If the police don't respond, then the protestors will just escalate their douchiness until they do.
I know this game, it's the game I used to play with my older brother. Harass him until he hits me, and then go whine to my parents. It was pretty douchey of me, but hey, I was a kid. These kids are supposed to be grown up, what's their excuse?
This story, on the other hand, is not just a political story but political activism, and needs to be nuked off the face of HN with extreme prejudice, because they're like weeds and have a tendency to take over.
The distinction is that people submit and upvote stories like these not because they think they're intellectually interesting, but because they're trying to make something happen politically.
Seriously, this got 76 upvotes? What do you think this is?
The answer is: "Depends". Though if your business model is immoral when applied to poor folks, it's still immoral when applied to rich folks.
My new year's resolution: no more commenting on things on the internet. Bye bye, everybody!