huem0n

This is so ROS2 that ROS2 can't even tell that its not ROS2

Nothing.tech is the spiritual successor to OnePlus

nothing.tech is the spirtual successor to OnePlus

You're absolutely right to flag these. We could enhance the authors method by using hooks and claude.md as a belt-and-suspenders approach— with hooks behaving as a robust load-bearing idempotent production-ready sidecar. The comments here provide the smoking gun that sharpen my previous conclusions about Claude's vernacular. I'll get started on a quick smoke-test of this system and let you know when it's landed.

Want me to take a first pass looking at the blast-radius this vocabulary change could effect?

You're absolutely right to flag this. We could enhance the authors approach by adding a belt-and-suspenders system using Claude.md as ledger and robust sidecar process to create a load-bearing idempotent production-ready system. The comments here provide a smoking gun and sharpens my previous conclusions. I'll get started on a quick smoke-test and let you know when it's landed.

Want me to take a first pass looking at other surfaces this vocabulary change could effect? Or would you like me to find other methods of reducing my vernacular to more terms that are more concise rather than verbose.

You're absolutely right to flag this. A approach using Claude.md as a ledger of less-than-ideal vocabulary reveals that the process is load-bearing and sharpens my previous conclusions. A belt-and-suspependers approach using a hook as a sidecar would honestly be a more production-ready approach. I'll get started on a quick smoke-test and let you know when it's landed.

...

Want me to take a first pass looking at other surfaces this vocabulary change could effect?

What conditions/what problem/who want to use this? It looks cool, I just have no context. Is it for game dev? Lightbulb manufactures?

Glad to see I'm not the only one that thinks its obvious

Require commercially used photos to not contain identifying information (face license plate) without consent of the owner (of the license plate/face).

This already happens a lot on Google street view.

I think it needs more detail but I like the idea.

Then let me put my own software on the hardware I own then.

> hobbyists can still publish apps in third party stores

I shouldn't need an internet connection just to make an app for a device I own.

Exactly, this would greatly reduce the ability for scammers in "urgent" situations, but for power users who flip the switch on day one it would rarely be a problem. What would be terrible though ... is if Google made it require a network connection or Google approval.

Under that logic, even if the app is "malicious" it would still be possible to install it. And thats not true, if somthing is deemed malicious, its blocked. Is app that hurts Google's dominance "malicious"? Who is it that decides what is malicious?

As a mere mortal I find none of this surprising, mostly because I never understood any of it in the first place ... :)