hsrada
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
Today, yes. Nobody is saying GPT-3 or 4 or even 5 will cause this. None of the chatbots we have today will evolve to be the AGI that everyone is fearing.
But when you go beyond that, it becomes difficult to ignore trend lines.
Here's a detailed scenario breakdown of how it might come to be –https://www.dwarkeshpatel.com/p/carl-shulman
The default consequence of AGI's arrival is doom. Aligning a super intelligence with our desires is a problem that no one has solved yet.
"The AI does not hate you, nor does it love you, but you are made out of atoms which it can use for something else."
----
Listen to Dwarkesh Podcast with Eliezer or Carl Shulman to know more about this.
There's the Vividness of Visual Imagery Quiz but that's self-administered and is a questionnaire.
(https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/213539-science-is-the-only-...)
Here's a twitter thread containing some 'quirky' personal websites, not quite portfolios though.
https://twitter.com/michael_nielsen/status/10026747950313267...
Except that the amusement and irony would cease to exist once you have some idea of what's happening behind the scenes.
The AI doesn't know it's "killing enemies". For it, it's just something that results in the increase of a numerical reward signal.
Since playing a lane as a ranged hero is very different from playing the same lane as a melee hero, I wonder whether the AI has learned to play melee heroes yet.
Now, a little older, the prospect of fines that will take a lifetime to repay and/or prison is way more deterring. As a kid, you just never think about it.
Read what you love until you love to read. Then you can move onto books that seem that they might have some pay off.
It is.
Asking as somebody that doesn't care much about politics but not averse to the idea of making an effort to understand it if the benefits>cost.
Drop your Twitter in your profile. Would love to give you a follow :)