hotsalad

Heh, the name makes it sound like a daemon.

service letterboxd enable; service letterboxd start

The latest release of FreeBSD with i386 images. The 14.x branch is the last to support the platform.

What are you talking about? There are no Minecraft assets in that screenshot, even with "pixels mixed around". I play both games and can tell you that screenshot is easily distinguished from Minecraft.

Broken link?

And asked to create a WebGL context and to view canvas data.

Closed and reopened the browser and revisited the site a couple times, and it thought it was my first and gave me a different fingerprint each time.

What this reminded me of was the fiasco of the McDonald's CEO referring to the Big Arch as a "product". Is it a product? Sure. That is about the least specific word he could have used for it, and it implies that he doesn't care that it is a cheeseburger, but that any type of item produced by any company he happened to lead would have made him equally happy.

It is likely true that he is just there to run a business and feels no sense of pride in its specific offerings, but the accidental honesty was amusing.

Ran Math.tanh(0.8) on Firefox on Windows and got the value that the article says is associated with Linux. Wonder why they only ran this on one browser.

Looks nice, but is it finished? I don't see a skybox or any of the more detailed information mentioned in the "about" dialog, and I don't see any effect from clicking the buttons along the top.

I allowed WebGL and disabled Enhanced Tracking Protection and my adblocker, and still only the star labels appear.

Why a 4GB model? I just tested Firefox's AI; when you long press a link and agree to enable summaries it downloads a mere 369MB model.

So, bookmarklets for Chrome's AI integration?

The latest Librewolf prompted me to allow the site permission to make a WebGL context. That's what it used for hardware detection.

This says I can't run anything, because it's missing some of the smallest models. I know that I can run Qwen3.5 up to 4B, Ministral 3B, Qwen3VL up to 4B, and I know there are some Gemmas and Llamas in my size range.

Wouldn't they still need to switch to a license outside the GPL family in order to add those restrictions, even if they're the sole copyright holder? Otherwise it seems that upon receiving a copy of the software, the user can just remove the additional restrictions, as specified by Section 7.

If I'm reading the (L)GPL correctly (but I'm not a lawyer), this notice should be completely ignored:

Section 7 says: All other non-permissive additional terms are considered “further restrictions” within the meaning of section 10. If the Program as you received it, or any part of it, contains a notice stating that it is governed by this License along with a term that is a further restriction, you may remove that term.

Section 10 says: You may not impose any further restrictions on the exercise of the rights granted or affirmed under this License.

*Formerly open source

Seems to violate the open source definition paragraph 5, no?