Recent submissions

Comment · 1 year ago
From the article: “ Navarro earned $235,000 in 2021, plus $95,000 in other pay and benefits…”
Comment · 1 year ago
You are not actually leading until you win/achieve something.

Europe has severed itself from major sources of the fundamental driver of civilization, energy, it has bet on “renewable energy” in reckless ways, which was demonstrated by the small black swan event energy grid collapse just mere weeks ago. Germany has totally abandoned nuclear energy and has no real alternatives as it imports the majority of its energy and all its renewable energy sources are subpar, at best, and are unsustainable without massively distorting government command economy subsidies keeping afloat what is essentially a Ponzi scheme with decreasing real marginal returns. Germany, the engine of Europe, which keeps the whole EU boondoggle afloat has an avg of €0.44/kwh electricity prices.

That does not really indicate energy leadership.

Maybe Germany can get productive fusion energy online, but it also does not solve the deeper issue of a political system and control mechanism that is self-harming.

It’s the near future: Germany has successfully provided operational fusion energy. German politics and psychological control will all the sudden just give up on blaming, punishing, and hating its own people?

Everyone in Germany gets free AC and free unlimited heating? Free cars and free transportation because fusion basically nullifies the cost of energy? No, the German/EU political class loathes its own people and is recreating aristocracy, which for its own purposes relies on control and suppression of the masses. If anything the EU Lords would use that de facto unlimited energy to create unlimited AI surveillance and thought-crime robot armies to control the serfs.

Comment · 1 year ago
The irony of the illusion is that even though “the iPhone is locked down”, practically speaking it is more your property than an android, unless things have changed since I last really cared about Android, even every single update that was pushed on you incrementally made the device and user experience slower and worse, to the point where basically your phone would accumulate performance lag incrementally and one year in you would be thinking about a new Android device. Meanwhile, a several years old iPhone basically has far closer performance to what it was on day one, even if not perfect.

It is yet another one of those oversights that people have just ignored, that when you buy a product like a phone, there is absolutely zero reason why it should not perform at the very least just as well as it did on day one if all the other conditions are the same, i.e., you have a choice about including any additional features. If you do not have a choice, e.g., because an update imposes some feature, then what you have on your hands is really just a company damaging your property.

Imagine if you took your car into mandatory services or if Tesla pushed mandatory updates that made your acceleration, breaking, turning response times slower and increased your gasoline or electric consumption; and then tried telling your how fast and smooth and efficient the new model is that behaves the same way that the old one did when you bought it.

It’s just fraud! If your update diminishes the performance and function of core capabilities, then you are liable for those damages, because you caused damages.

Comment · 1 year ago
No. You are just not paying attention or just resorting to weather typical abusive manipulative tactics. I did not claim to know it all, I simply stated that I have that experience and it is not an exaggeration. I nor you will ever “know it all”, regardless of whatever compels you to be spiteful and seemingly jealous.
Comment · 1 year ago
No. I do not flag or censor things at all under regular circumstances because I actually practice the belief that it is in fact a human right to free expression unless it is aggressively abusive or actually threatening. I will also tolerate regular harsh and abusive words and in most cases if I don’t tolerate it I will just not read it or look away or even just block. I’m not vindictive like most people seem to be today where an ideological mob forms to suppress heretical ideas that their herding instincts compel them to suppress in order to be a good member of the herd.
Comment · 1 year ago
You’re being manipulative, the substantive point is that he cannot possibly have an even remotely accurate understanding of anything he is talking about.

Isn’t that what the last decades of ethnic abuse against “white peoples” has been about, accusing them of not knowing how it feels to be {insert some people of color label}, while also at the same time demanding proximity to “whites”?

So why would he know anything about “whites” (for brevity) but “whites” can’t speak on peoples of color even when they are demanding proximity to “whites”?

It is really rather abusive and narcissistic.

It reminds me of an Indian got I met that was exploring the German employment law to travel the world in his employer’s dime, who told me that the German economy and society was not “dynamic enough”, by which I assume he meant how he was being dynamic. And this coming from someone from a society where open defection, levels of pollution, filth, and disease are at levels that most westerners simply do not seem to have the ability to comprehend and refuse to accept when you tell them; and economy that is largely based on fraud, deception, and success is based on being able to pull over over of people, especially westerners who they’ve conflated with the British so they are proud of now conquering and destroying.

Comment · 1 year ago
Yes, but you are missing the point. It is the issue of riding in at the last minute to benefit from the product of others’ work.

Don’t get me wrong, you’re not the only one that misses this whole issue. It is a gargantuan elephant in the room that very few people seem to be able to even get even when it is pointed out for some reason. It is fundamentally also the very core issue of “communism” and “capitalism” for that matter, albeit in different ways; wanting to exploit the dries of others’ labor.

Comment · 1 year ago
I’m a bit disappointed that you resorted to deflection. You’re being defensive. It implies to me that you really know what I’m talking about and your subconscious is trying to ward it off.

Reality simply is that freeloading is a condition, not something you need to take personal. If you are equally benefiting from things you did not contribute to at the same total cost as those previously invested, then you are freeloading.

Should you be able to buy Bitcoin today at the original offering price? Should you have equal control as heirs of a company you did not build?

I fail to see why you and seemingly a few other people find that challenging to understand. If you pay the same price to, e.g., ride the “cheap and effective” public transportation in Europe that Europeans have been taxed hundreds of millions in capital costs over several decades to build up, how is that not freeloading?

Sure, you can’t even not freeload if you wanted to by paying higher prices and the real issue are the abusive and toxic governments in Europe in my example, but explain to me how a little old lady that gets €1000/month in pension after a life of turning Europe into what it was until recently, being taxed 40% all get life should pay the same price for a rail ticket as an American making double the European salary and paying around 25% taxes?

These are not challenging concepts. It’s a bit disheartening that presumably technical/dev type people do not understand basic systems.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton