hoophoop
Joined 9 years ago
Joined 9 years ago
There is plenty wrong. Even Adam Smith's purely theoretical concept of "free market" requires buyers and sellers to be purely rational actors and be fully and correctly informed.
Advertising has one goal: making customers less rational and more biased towards a given product.
Good. That's why the quality is so high.
It's another a measure of the ever increasing inequality in some countries.
Such topic that certainly impacts the life of people commenting on HN.
People write articles to provide information. Reader read the article and learn.
It's implied here:
"I think being really broke greatly hinders your ability to think rationally."
...by putting that sentence out alone without clarifying the context.
> psychological pathways
> unfairly reify
Are you feeling ok?
99% of people believe that he single-handedly invented the press with movable type. Ask around.
No: being really broke can cause a lot of anxiety that can lead to irrational behavior.
But often a person has to choose between homelessness and crime and picks the latter as a rational choice, given the alternative.
So please don't assume poor = "crazy" = criminal, it's a bit unkind.
Often I found more difficult to understand English written by native speakers than by others because of that.
You can easily ask the OS what layout is being used or even ask the user.
No. There's no definition of what they map to.
That's why we need USERS to be able to scale the ranges of brightness and contrast.
My environment changes during the day. I want to be the one in control of my screen, not some random website.
What's even worse - almost all Epub readers don't do proper sandboxing.
I worked in FAANGS where simplicity really mattered over hype.