hoffs

I'd say it provides a lot of information about whole situation, including context on how wikipedia operates and history of behavior from the creator of the language.

Furthermore, if you do treat this blog post (blog is generally tracked as someone's opinion) as ad hominem, you'd agree that the author of the language participates in ad hominem attacks as well as notes by the blog post?

geee, nobody is targeting you

Golden rule to get exploited

Doing penny testing yourself is different from letting a chunk of your user base test it

You only need to know where the person was or when crime was committed,

It's up to the customersthat were affected, they could sue for damages, but doubt many will do

So why is it misleading? Don't think anyone is going to listen to a podcast just for that.

Ironic

The details part is so miniscule that I doubt it even matters. You'd have difficult time trying to enumerate uuidv7s anyways.

Yeah, just like having a Google meet with speakers and microphone that's built in, when someone is speaking it gets cancelled out

Yes, it's well known and established that cold climates has negative effect on batteries. Of course if you're trying to get the best result you optimize the conditions. Just look how most sports records and times are set with best conditions available.

What does this have to do with failing gps devices

How would you know in the first place

> “But Andrew, Docker is already a thing. It’s been a thing for some time, even.” Correct. But everyone knows what a virtual machine is. Not everyone understands Docker. Do you want to risk sending someone off on a wild goose chase learning what containerization is, when they could be learning your thing instead? Meet your student where they are, not where you wish they were.

Ironic

More like 1 to 5%, I doubt any higher percentage bothers to update