Recent submissions

Comment · 1 month ago
They are both infuriating, as a long-time user of both.
Comment · 1 month ago
I've known people involved in the creation of the Intercept. It wasn't funded with the purpose to report the Snowden documents, but rather that came along as an opportunity that they thought would create a big splash for the launch of a new news platform that would shake up the industry. The billionaire involved didn't anticipate the fury from the authorities (i.e. receiving personal, serious phone calls from various govt. figures and agencies) and they quickly came to regret everything and adjusted course. I know this is a "trust me bro" comment but it's worth sharing.
Comment · 2 months ago
I'm not arguing, there are a lot of things at play, clearly.
Comment · 2 months ago
Did they have phones back then?
Comment · 2 months ago
Taking the UK as an example, legislation restricting the use of children under 14 in employment was only adopted in 1933. Previously it looked more like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_labour_in_the_British_In...

The USA didn't change things up considerably until the 1930s: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_labor_in_the_United_Stat...

Not soon after, obviously ww2 and then the baby boom after that. The role of children in families changed hugely in the 20th century.

Comment · 2 months ago
Your great great grandparents didn't effectively get fined for having each child. It was quite the opposite.

You make some really good points, but I feel they are a result of a greed-pilled, mean-spirited and individualistic-to-the-point-of-self-harm culture we're all sadly living under rather than the underlying cause.

Comment · 3 months ago
Also bear in mind that the industrial revolution in the UK occurred under the British Empire, which extracted a lot of wealth and resources from its territories, usually under less-than-fair arrangements. It is hard to imagine the British industrial revolution without this benefit - they were not separate aspects of the economy.
Comment · 3 months ago
In the short-term. Thanks for proving my point on perspective.
Comment · 3 months ago
We're also facing a climate and pollutant crisis as a species so we seem only capable of thinking in the short term. We're not doing that well right now after only a brief period of industrialisation.
Comment · 3 months ago
It's a metaphor for a process. Calling people names like "maxxers" is unhelpful and probably against the rules here.
Comment · 4 months ago
Comment · 4 months ago
You need to start using LLMs a lot and then you will know how we know.

Edit: You know how you can recognise someone just from their gait while they walk towards you? I would struggle to describe that for an individual person but it doesn't mean I can't identify them from that alone.

Comment · 4 months ago
It's called lobbying.
Comment · 5 months ago
We weren't meant to have windows made of glass. Such items are entirely unnatural. According to pg, we must be wary of them.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton