higherup
Joined 5 years ago
Karma
-3
Submissions
40
Member since
Aug 22
Recent submissions
Comment · 5 years ago
Comment · 5 years ago
The risks of Vaccines is not limited to the AEFI caused by a proper preparation of the Vaccine, but also include the problems with manufacturing such as this as well...
Also, I wonder what the foreign substance was.
Comment · 5 years ago
>At this point with billions of people vaccinated around the world, the risk profiles are pretty accurate
No. With out no strictly mandated reporting of AEFIs, billions of administrated doses cannot indicate a safety profile..
Even with around 1% events reported, the serious events are around 1 in 5000
Comment · 5 years ago
>If serious adverse events are 1 in 100,000
They are not. They are like 1 in 5000 (still based on volutary reporting)
https://www.medsafe.govt.nz/COVID-19/vaccine-report-overview...
Comment · 5 years ago
>Just get the vaccine, it's not hard.
Getting the Vaccine is easy. What is hard is to trust the what every biased, safety studies done on it and the fact the AEFI reporting system is not strictly mandated, indicating a bias from the authorities to not want to know about potential vaccine injuries.
As usual, this comment will get flagged. If you see this comment check back a bit later to see the shilling on HN.
Comment · 5 years ago
Envious? I feel pity for them.
Poor suckers might live 200 years in a world devoid of any sort of fun.
Comment · 5 years ago
>I mean that groups without any conflict of interest can gather population level data and evaluate for themselves how effective the vaccines are,
It won't work because for every such group, there will be 10 groups with high conflict of interest that can counter any finding of your hypothetical group, and journals with conflict of interests will reject the findings of that group, but instead give high visibility to the reports of high-conflict of interest groups..
Quickly no one will dare to research the said topic.
Comment · 5 years ago
> Who is to stop me doing that?
me.
Comment · 5 years ago
What do you do when assasins call you an assasin (Apocalypse now...)?
What do you call it when you kill, in the name of saving lives?
Comment · 5 years ago
No it does not.
Because that would be like saying, just because all you got is a binocular with very limited magnification/resolving power, satelites for jupiter does not exist, because you cannot see them through it.
Someone should name this fallacy.
Comment · 5 years ago
>The beauty of science is that now that the vaccines are out there it becomes easier to independently access them and move our knowledge further in the right direction.
Can you clarify what you mean by this?
There is nothing to hide if there is no data collected in the first place. Here in this video, you can see that even injuries sustained by people who took part in the trials are being rejected by the doctors citing as caused by "anxiety".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxqC9SiRh8
I think people are completely oblivious to this issue, and is under this fallacy that if there was something wrong with the vaccines, then the information will automatically appear in public perception. If you think this, you need to only look at how smoking went on for a long time without the people noticing any problem with it.
With vaccines, we know that the signal is killed right at the point of generation, because the medical practicioners are conditioned (being charitable here) to reject any injury as not being caused by the Vaccines.