hexasquid

The way we do this is to have period "post project" metric checks, looking for

- are the users using the new feature (repeatedly)

- what sentiment is associated with it on customer calls (extracted via call transcripts, but ideally the relevant engineer joins the call)

Cool report

%s/toxic expert/hn commenter/

Can konsole do the fancy shader and inline images? I think that's all that distinguishes the others but I may be overlooking things.

Oh, I was thinking verify what the doc claims to what the code actually does, I misunderstood you.

That's like me with violins!

Seems like an AI could be tasked with verifying the docs. Then a human can double check it's work if it finds anything.

Go back a few years "css isn't a real programming language, there are no functions or control flow"

These arrive

"no! NO!"

3. AGENTS.md tells you not to

For a second I didnt see where it says "made by my own two hands", but it's down the bottom.

Phew!

I gather it goes through an intermediate coercion step where it is "1" + "hello".

What trips us up is having existing expectations for what an operator called + should do.

I suspect all branches of tech have their rite of passage.

For haskellers, it is writing a monad tutorial

For javascripters, it is writing a framework

For make-stuff-with-LLM people, it is producing a diagram explaining your code generation factory

... and so on

It would be subversive if the large corporation doing science in space turned out to be benign

Even a stalker would draw the line there.