Recent submissions

Comment · 8 years ago
Comment · 9 years ago
I wonder how much of a role wetting/capillary effects play in this? The liquid interface will distort as it approaches the object, and will try to meet at a certain contact angle (based on surface tensions etc). Correcting for this might help improve the resolution of the scans?
Comment · 9 years ago
This is speculation, but perhaps there's a game-theory issue here. If IEEE loses money by people pirating (and you can apply the usual counter-arguments about whether the pirateer would have gone on to purchase it anyway) rather than paying then publishing costs increase to cover that loss, and therefore hurting the authors who must cover that increase in future if they want to publish in the journal again.

A better situation is where the preprint or open access version is available.

Comment · 10 years ago
Comment · 10 years ago
Comment · 10 years ago
Comment · 11 years ago
It's interestingly that the Gibbs phenomenon appears visually as a whiplash effect. You can see how it would only get worse as higher order terms are included.
Comment · 11 years ago
Comment · 11 years ago
Comment · 12 years ago
I pictured looking top-down at the object, for which the shadow seemed quite natural?
Comment · 12 years ago
Comment · 12 years ago
This is lovely, would probably make a nice print! I'm working my way through Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars trilogy; this makes a great accompaniment.
Comment · 12 years ago
This might be an interesting idea for a vim plugin too, need to teach myself vim-script first...
Comment · 12 years ago
Comment · 12 years ago

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton