hasty_pudding

News needs sensationalism.

Thanks for posting another side of this.

What you're saying makes a lot of sense.

what languages don't use objects to implement non-primitive data structures?

like a binary tree for example

What languages on Earth implement non-primitive data structures without objects?

I guess maybe low level c and assembly where you implement everything as bits in physical memory?

you know how unsufferable it is when people bog a conversation down with semantics instead of ideas.

the point is obvious.

Being that every single language on Earth uses objects for non-primitive data structures that should be inferrable to a reasonable person.

a data structure in that context is clearly an ordered grouping of objects versus an unordered/loose grouping of objects.

Very far

You definitely need generic node objects to define the nodes.

You could have a completely stateless class/object that would manipulate those nodes and add them and remove them from the data structure.

"all functions are pure, there is no data mutation, and entities are represented by data structures instead of objects."

God i love to see this

The problem is you don't know if it's a blunder until after.

don't know what you're getting downvoted it is true