hasahmed

100%

same

Hating it TBH. I feel like it took away a lot of what I enjoyed about programming but its often so effective and I'm under so much pressure to be fast that I can't not use it.

I really appreciated this article. It would be great to see a smaller svg graphics standard. I think SlimSVG is a bad name because it implies its still SVG. It should set its self apart. Just my 2 cents.

Very interesting. I'm happy I read it. I think that seeking simplicity in code for me is often trying to find the most simple and straightforward way to write the code so that I can understand it. This usually boils down to good naming, and good encapsulation of tackling specific problems into specific (ideally well named) places.

Tuche

Is there a repository of Gooeys people have made?

Very interesting. I wonder if researchers take the time to make sure they have hardware that can handle such things

cat foo.json | jq .

In regards to all the talk of not being able to verify your video source; perhaps we'll go back to film for things that need to be probably legitimate. Though perhaps that has the same issues.

Yes

Gc was a mistake? On what possible authority can you make such a claim?

The article delivers on the title. That's good enough for me

A valid concern, but also humans are guaranteed to make mistakes and I'm sure a high percentage of them, so anything that lowers that error rate is an improvement even if it's not perfect. My thoughts anyway