harmoat

Since these 3 results are so similar are they a subset of a more general concept?

Aren't large neural network already black boxes we don't understand built by machines we understand?

Reasonable healthcare, parental leave and vacation minimums were not acquired in the countries that have them by "the magic of a functional government" but by people organising in big enough groups to matter and bargaining with the government and employers.

Like Wikipedia but a Forum?

In France, they can also take it from your salary.

My math teacher used to only have a tiny piece of paper with the thing he had to talk about during the lecture; since we had to prove everything we learned during this class, more often than once he couldn't remember how to prove some thing and usually happily sent a student to the blackboard to think together about how to prove the proposition. I thought that was a great way of teaching maths.

Superdeterminism isn't supposed to be an alternative to QM, usually it's an alternative interpretation of QM which allows hidden variables from what i've gathered.

This is probably where GAI would be really useful.

Reagan could

Remember, wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a textbook

The entropy in the various particles (photos, neutrinos, gravitons etc) the stars are emitting from being formed probably is more than the entropy lost from the gas clouds ordering themselves into stars would be my guess.

> Free will and determinism aren't necessarily incompatible.

How?

To be fair wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopedia, not a textbook.

That's circular logic with a dubious interpretation of quantum physics. The idea that consciousness could somehow be the cause of the collapse of the wave function is anthropocentrism and shows a poor understanding of what measurement is.

Does the area grow less than quadratically with the radius on the surface of a shpere?