hamdouni

Maybe fair to compare to using AI subscription ~20$/m (not Anthropic neither Openai)

The emiter pays, not the receiver

From unlimited AI tokens to massive layout and beyond !

More like boo.com - I know, that's old folks.

There must be another way, one where we can stay online without being trapped in toxic social networks

I like this one and find it easily actionable

... I think the paradigm has to shift. We should apply to AI-generated mathematical announcements the same standards of rigour, clarity, and exposition that we demand from human-generated papers. Do you want the approval of the mathematical community? A badge of legitimacy? Then give us something that is actually readable and verifiable. If not, we should simply ignore it.

In other words, I do not think that we, as a community, should spend our time cleaning up their mess in order to increase someone else’s commercial revenues. ...

Enrico Fatighenti

One can have multiple services on one server, using a reverse proxy to distribute trafic.

Skip kubernetes and deploy to bare server

Genuine question: how will this "software for one" outlive its creator? I realize that if it were truly intended for just one user, it wouldn't matter, but in this specific case, the software is used by family members, so...

Or imap !

Yeah, i'm also surprised people just read post title and jump to conclusions ...

"Community Activity: How to guarantee you'll get free, fast support when you hit a bug."

Why is this a pillar of using open source in a business ? Take every thing for you enrichment and give back nothing ? What a f* mindset.

Corry's enshitification is in charge

So we are cycling back to kind of Waterfall Development ? No more agility ? The trend is dead by AI ?