hagbarth

No you will still get access to newer models on the subscription. You should have access to Sonnet 5, which is new. It's just Mythos class models that are API only.

For now... You never know with these companies.

It was not.

Yes, but I don’t see either of those scenarios giving them the growth needed to justify a trillion dollar valuation. Especially with the current competition (a competitor releases a much better model, and they have to respond or see their revenue drop).

So I don’t see a company in immediate danger of collapsing, but I also don’t see a great investment at that valuation.

Well. $60b in bloated stock is probably much better than the $10b cash penalty for not going through with the deal.

The alternative is to be explicit when you nerf, so users know what they are working with.

Because 5 days is not enough for the market to discover the price of SpaceX. And the rules were changed so the float is weighted as if it was much much larger than it is.

Danish public broadcaster. Probably the best reputation in the world on Danish news.

Do you have any hard lines for what an AI should be able to generate for you?

> Do you have evidence for that?

Check the post history. It’s pretty obvious

I have no idea why they would do that. Outside blatant corruption, which we shouldn't discount.

Also if a person always wanted to write a book I don’t think prompting an AI will scratch that itch.

Except the models don’t actually compute anything other than text generation. The entire way they interact with computers is through the shell or other api layers on the OS

> and might be the renaissance for small to one person game studios.

Indie games are already bigger than ever as far as I know.

How so?

This isn’t a political move. It’s a pension fund derisking a small part of their investments by moving them out of a riskier asset.