gulbanana

It doesn't. It feels better to work with, because it has a higher rate of successfully understanding my code and then producing code that extends it in the way I instructed. I don't care whether the output is colloquial English.

I'm sure opinions vary if you're using it outside of a coding agent. I don't know why programmers are complaining, though.

When Mullvad's revenue is used to harm people, why should its customers feel safe?

Fable had very confident decision-making and would push past obstacles that Opus finds daunting :(

`anthropics` is Anthropic's GitHub username.

The embittered tone and obvious bad faith of your comments here make it clear how seriously we should take your opinions about AI.

The legacy systems are not very important. The new ones will be supported.

Relative links are common in the Microsoft ecosystem; the IIS webserver, in its default configuration, serves websites at a subpath named something like /Our.App/ instead of at /. Frontends often use the <base> tag so that they can refer to assets by relative path, allowing different environments to have different base paths.

It’s not “the West”. The USA is quite different to many OECD nations in this regard (and others).

are all of you called Matt over there?

It cannot and will not be fixed in an automated fashion.

There was a recent court decision in Germany, ruling that websites must respect the Do Not Track header.

Both of those things are true. Many CVEs are unimportant, but serious security vulnerabilities do exist, and are very hard to avoid entirely when writing C.

Can’t they? It seems to be within their legal powers, and the elected officials directing them clearly approve.

Like the standard library - they don't plan to support exceptions.