grumio

Read. The incident described had no one assaulting law enforcement.

He was helping up a woman that was on the ground. LEO needlessly got involved and started and escalated the "shoving match."

Dude. LEO shot him on purpose. You use the passive voice like it was a natural disaster or accident. He had no fire arm on him at the time of the shooting. Why are you so insistent on spinning things this way?

Was that the day he died? Or earlier?

you claim Pretti interfered with LE from performing their duties.

What causes you to believe that?

Do you think surrendering combatants should be killed?

He doesn't even have to lie about what he meant. Trump-whisperers like 0xy do it for free.

Allll of your comments have been disparaging Pretti, and his attitude, his intentions, and so on. It is obvious.

Only when you're called out, do you mention self defense. Glad to see you have shame. Bye.

You keep implying it without explicitly saying it:

You, ljsprague, believe Alex Pretti was executed for committing an offense.

Do you dispute this?

Was he executed for committing an offense(which is what you seem to be getting at, by making assumptions about Pretti, instead of focusing on self-defense)?

I hope you don't think that, that would be honestly disgusting. I'd strongly disagree with your stance for vigilantism and against law-and-order.

Or was he killed in self defense? And if so, why would the ICE agents be in fear for their life? I didn't see a reason myself but I want to know your perspective. Was there something in the video?

having a gun = intent to interfere?

Interesting. Does having intent to interfere deserve execution?

Oh edit to add: did he interfere? And if so how?

Unclear to me if he was a protestor, he seemed to just be a guy with a camera phone and tried to help a woman stand up.

What are you implying, ljsprague?

I'm taking a charitable interpretation of your take for sure. I do see the value of additional levers, but I don't think realistically it would be feasible to make such a court.

Counter-point: I don't think Chauvin would've been brought to justice if he were tried in some kind of cop-court.

I'm open minded though, I appreciate your perspective, gave me food for thought.

Welcome to the free marketplace of ideas, dude. Talk about the issue I'm talking about instead of ranting on some vague generalization about how "believing your own eyes" is bad sometimes, thus is always bad???

If someone were talking disprovable nonsense about fairies, it would be totally fair to bring up counter-evidence. This comment of yours is substanceless.