grrandalf
Joined 4 years ago
Joined 4 years ago
+1; How close is my paraphrasing to what you were thinking?
achievement(person) = potential(person) - adversity(person)
People implicitly assume the 'adversity' term is negligible. But in reality, the 'adversity' term can very large, and vary widely from person to person.
[yep the "equation" isn't dimensionally consistent. It's meant to be a "completion prompt" to your internal LLM to translate those tokens to a longer paragraph.]
Thoughts on this devil’s advocate perspective? “Don’t design/propose what your org can’t build.”
thoughts?
(GenX'er fwiw)
3-6 mo of one engineer to migrate to something so hardcore as Bazel seems very good actually, especially since it seems they Did It Right. The flows in 200-engineer size org can be quite complicated.
Follow up: I was wondering if bazel's hardcore declarativeness + opinionatedness-about-reproducibility might help increase confidence in some situations, e.g. an organization making binary distributions of their software to external partners.
Others are good points too. Thanks!