Recent submissions

Comment · 1 month ago
I will add this to my long list of reasons I feel sorry for city dwellers :(
Comment · 2 months ago
No I mean land acknowledgement as in proclaiming "I'd like to acknowledge we're on the land of the..." before a meeting. No one's trying to give up any of their own land or property to anyone. It's always someone else's land somewhere else.
Comment · 2 months ago
We're not talking about being completely isolated. We're talking about no limits on migration and permanent settlement. Of course cultures change and aren't static. But these no borders people are just as foolish as the no immigration people imo
Comment · 2 months ago
> For the vast >95% of human history, if you could walk to somewhere and survive there, you could live there

For 95% of human history we were hunter gatherers living in extremely sparsely populated areas.

Comment · 2 months ago
No one actually thinks this is hypocrisy. No one is giving up their houses to Native Americans. They do an land acknowledgement and call it even. Even the most liberal among us don't feel it's necessary to sacrifice any meaningful amount of their own comfort to right some past wrongs.
Comment · 2 months ago
The US is too large to have one monolithic culture but it certainly contains many subcultures on the regional level. I won't dispute they're on the decline though.
Comment · 2 months ago
Yes that is a great example. You certainly don't want what happened to them happening to you.
Comment · 2 months ago
People aren't simply interchangeable units of economic output, and when they live together for long periods of time they develop unique and distinct cultures that are dear to them. Letting the entirety of the world into your country without stops is cultural suicide. If you put any a value in preserving culture you will find it ethical to put some limit on immigration. Assimilation is possible but there is a limit to the rate and amount of foreigners a place can absorb before changing significantly.
Comment · 2 months ago
Yeah, people leave their things to their children. It's been happening for quite some time now. You should look into it.
Comment · 2 months ago
I see what you're saying. But China wouldn't be just trying to control the strait, they'd presumably be trying to take the island over and willing to commit ground troops. Also I'm not sure if you're aware of the extent of the damage Iran did to US bases on the area but you can count on the same thing happening to any of ours in the region. I just don't see what we'd be able to do other than lob some missiles at them. And we're already low on those too now
Comment · 2 months ago
Do you think any of those countries are going to try or see capable of stopping China from taking Taiwan?
Comment · 2 months ago
How so?

"They obviously had no plan..."

How does that imply someone had realistic plansm

Comment · 2 months ago
It's hard to overstate how poorly this whole thing was thought out and executed. They obviously had no plan for what we'd do when Iran seized the strait. This is going to go down as the definitive beginning of the decline leading to the eventual end of US global hegemony. To think anyone ever mentioned defending Taiwan from China lol

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton