Recent submissions

Comment · 9 years ago
You don't have to reinvent a thing, just use some ffi (foreign function interface) implementation and call into whatever you want.
Comment · 9 years ago
Comment · 9 years ago
Linkedin demanded me to log in to read.. I'd be happy to read this w/o logging in / registering. Are you aware of a non-Linkedin link?
Comment · 9 years ago
Wrt search, I guess it's seen as an orthogonal problem and meant to be dealt with by indexing / search services..
Comment · 10 years ago
I'd expect to see something like this in the FAQ section: How is it possible to diff/merge Skov program soucre trees?

Just asking, it's definitely possible. I used to work at a CAD company, they did some dev work to do these with building models...

Comment · 10 years ago
I'd be in favor of having some standard "code review markup language", which could contain review comments and workflows. Then you would be able to put these in files and make those files part of your repository (ie commit/push).

Then, you could build various frontends to handle these in a user friendly way if you like. But also, would be accessible and editable in your favorite text editor.

Comment · 10 years ago
Comment · 10 years ago
Personally, I NOP-ed all arrow keys _and_ hjkl also, after I found myself keeping j pressed to get to an area at the bottom of the window. Which would be an L. Then NOP-ed, bit by bit, many other things which could be done faster. 90% of my movements are search, BWtf{} and some scrolling with zt zz zb. The only case I found the lack of hjkl problematic so far is in block visual mode.

Another anti-pattern I did was Da and dWi, NOP-ed them and forced myself to start using C and cW respectively. Not much of an achievement, but feels better :) Same for x, I deleted whole words with x, then pressed i, I removed the mapping of x.

Conclusion: in case you think you have an anti-pattern, just NOP the mappings. In case one or two turns out to be too much of restriction, you could always remove the NOP mapping later.

Comment · 10 years ago
Comment · 10 years ago
Comment · 12 years ago
In FastMail you could already search based on some of the email headers, like from:thatpurplecompany.com (or has:attachment, https://www.fastmail.fm/help/receive/search.html) and then you could save the search.. It's visually not that rich, but it solves your problem.

Tagging (for me) is more about ad-hoc grouping. As giving it a thought right now it's even hard for me to come up with a realistic use case.

Comment · 12 years ago
Me too.
Comment · 13 years ago
I've been using it for 1.5 yrs now, they're pretty good. Switched from Gmail. They don't have a calendar yet (it's on their stack though).
Comment · 13 years ago
Makes sense. It could be difficult to raise money for prevention and rehabilitation purposes from the tax approach. Although maybe wealthy recreational users would happily "fund" the education / rehabilitation of the poor. Or maybe I'm just completely wrong here :D

I agree with the other points you've discussed.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton