graphememes

at this point i'd take people who complete tasks

just ban everyone from using ai completely lets go back to how it used to be

I don't disagree with the article, but I also don't disagree with RTK. The output of these commands is not optimized for agents (or humans) for that matter.

Most of the comments here have never used cursor before and it really shows

so is it gonna be called the foku or foxu?

gmail is the best and worst email system on earth

they really don't know how to integrate AI into it at all, and honestly I think a part of that comes down to a little bit of column a and column b. Where column a is that they are constrained by privacy and column b is they are constrained by complete politics driven work cycles that don't allow them to rethink or rework things at all or try things out.

I'm pretty sure to do a single change it requires 50 coordination calls with like 5 different executive levels 8 kpi alignment meetings 6 product managers in varying different rooms 3 different user group studies and finally after all that you might be able to ship something but it's nothing close to what you or the user originally wanted.

such is the way of "startups"

even this is ai output

Pressed 1 for everything, no regrets

It's 100% AI generated

You also end up finding that it's really tradeoffs all the way down.

Hm. Saying "AI cannot solve motivation" or "AI cannot solve judgment" may be too static. AI can change the conditions under which motivation or judgment appear. For many people, this is such the case.

It's gambling, community, status and fun. Some people find it hard to understand that.

> gamify usage > people abuse it > shocked_pickachu.jpg

yep, sounds about right

good step in a direction

Losing on a technicality kind of sucks ngl