gradschoolfail

>> Problems… —PH

With gratitude, i’d already riffen on this with “… [YC] proved its salt…”

Riffing on the schlep of “talking to users” my current (more designori-oriented?) variant is “building a marketplace Elon style”

Top of my deadtree stack is Chazelle, The Discrepancy Method (1998)

(Father of the regrettably more famous Chazelle, if you’re okay californicating rabbit holes)

If you interpret (like i do) AGI as “median human level allweather selfdriving cars”, 2030 sounds a little optimistic even for that.

If AGI is IMO 6/6(/6) 2030 might be even less optimistic but the confidence interval for “Bethlehem*” is wider..

Weeds sounds like shlep without the chutzpah while your former sounds like chutzpah without the shlep?

For the optimum (i.e. “pinnacle”) shall we use the latinate term “panache”? (Or do you have something more victorian)

*the Shoggoth shlepping towards <= welleremembered ~Edwardian poem

En wiki claims (via Gorky) he was entitled to sign off as a statskiy sovetnik(‘s son)

Hopefully one of you will supersede von Neumann, in one mega Step

Teach physics to geology enthusiasts so i can land a government contract involving fossils..

(I dont need those contracts, i just desire them. Which gov is interested in fossils? The right gov)

I realized the beekeeper quasidoggerel was perhaps inspired by a recent movie (2024) i hadnt heard about..

Though breaking taps violated the Thorne-Weiss rules of game playing, i appreciated the effective documentation of thymos

(Thus to him, were i a transmogrified VC would transfer sam zeloof’s genius points)

Upon snowcloning the Melian dialog to the context of Gwern(‘s interview)

   The foxes protect from dismissal using what they can hide and the lions suffer the misinterpretations that result from successful marketing

Its also worth placeholdering that PG’s role model is the aanglo neoEdwardian(?) (Bloomsbury) jMKeynes rather than the teutonic (neoVic) vonMises, considering the diverging hypernormal interpretations of their legacy.

(Compare with anglophile GCL?)

Refactoring KST’s (from Rainer?) “only 2 games worth playing, the opening game and the endgame”, i propose: “only 2 things worth doing: showing its possible or making it easy”

Not to needlessly alleviate your suffering, but what is LTL?

Of course, these Nobel Bauble driven days, “quantum memories” sound like little more than search engine bawdlerised AdWords..