gotbeans

I have had claude do the same, plus reorder nfs mounts, share templates, and do some init-container magic to start vpn/gluetun with port-forwarding, all in a k8s cluster. It's become so easy to manage and debug.

In the same universe, I took a google takeout last week to migrate to immich, 12k photos/videos.

I set up immich backed by ceph last week and I got everything migrated via immich-go, with all metadata albums and all.

Had to change some parallelization option, but otherwise it was a breeze.

Linkedin awards

You didn't really say much of what does it do wrong or right, you seem to just try to convey a for-granted idea.

I've been an msft employee for a couple of years and teams... Was ok. I prefer slack, but meetings, video, messaging, formatting, etc. was just fine in teams.

> Criptography

You mean criptography and trust right?

I think there must be still some corp frameworks that do use it extensively, but it's just not heard all that much about.

Some examples, (Broadcom) Vmware NSX-T gateways, Alivaba used to use it, and a lot of extreme HFT use it too, mostly to reduce latency and manipulate tcp.

Proton did't just allow me to play on linux. It allowed me to uninstall windows.

Ty valve

You can still exec yourself into the pods. No one said you cannot. There is no shell or ssh on the hosts for you to login to, but still if you absolutely must you can create a privileged container and mount /. Whole point is you shouldn't.

It probably accounts for the k8s release unless they download it post-boot?

Imo this makes no sense. There's zero chance you will start inspecting all dependencies even in a relatively small application, which now a days could pull already a large number of deps.

I don't see how doing any of this manually will help.

Linux is a massive foot-gun in the hands of someone random, it is built with certain assumptions in mind that don't bode well with how companies want to ship you stuff, and how they envision to "keep you safe".

Of course if a company wants to ship you something linux-based is going to be brutally adultetred, or otherwise you might even be able to really own the thing and do whatever you want with it, which is very much the opposite companies want when they sell you something.

> Ah, yes. Everything must be monetized. > Very well then, let us ask what is the business model for this monetized desktop Linux?

On point. Not every (sound) technical decision is monetizable.

The article completely handwaves that "gold mine" statement.

Where's the incentive in any of that? Pour money in linux desktop development for what? (So we can have linux desktop... sooner?)

If there were any money to be made in linux desktop, it would have already happened imo, or otherwise the cost-opportunity is still to high.

If anything, more than a gold mine, looks like a gold sink to me

And don't get me wrong, been on arch for 7 years and i've long since ditched win. But I still don't think there's any meaningful incentives for companies to push for linux desktop.

>I dont see anything wrong with squatting in empty homes.

Do you care if the owner cares about you squatting in his property?