gonight

Never thought I'd say this, but, "thank god I use unifi".

The idea of a drug addicted undocumented immigrant being in charge of our space program and sat comms does seem incredibly unwise.

> Suleyman argues AI models may become even harder to control if they're told to think they have feelings and rights: "Frankly, with this additional baggage, I think it would make them a catastrophic threat to human civilisation," Suleyman says.

This feels like a villain's reasoning, and I'm kind of astounded he's just saying it out loud.

The link redirects to this comment section?

In my twenty years of being a netizen I have never been more concerned about the future of computing. Giving a handful of incredibly shady corporations humanity's future seems really unwise.

Be the solarpunk you want to see in the world.

The politician using twitter, which has (and I'm going to try to state this as neutrally as possible) a free public AI-powered CSAM generator, to decry OpenAI for going too far, is the kind of sublime absurdity that would be impossible to explain to someone in the 2010s.

My bank can support my phone or accept that I'm going to come waste their time in person, I'm not backing down here.

Right, let's just ignore multiple instances of city councils receiving hours of impassioned speeches from constituents then unanimously voting against the will of the people.

Yay cloudflare!

I'll tolerate that but that new QR recaptcha that wants a selfie is 'hell fucking no' from me 100% of the time.

Had a palm pre, loved it. Simpler times.

Wasn't the entire premise of the modern digital panopticon to stop exactly this kind of stuff?

I wonder what this is a distraction from...