goatcode

>After that the drone will move up and down a few meters, before heading off at walking pace in the direction of the nearest representatives of Ukraine’s army, it says.

>The video also warns that the drone’s battery may run low, in which case it will head back to base and the soldiers should stay put and await a fresh one.

So follow it, unless it's heading to a base. Is it clear when its battery is low? Maybe it just goes faster.

I'm glad this knowledge and discussion is still alive and well. F them for this.

Relationships in time work transitively -- if each successive generation is worse, they're by definition worse than any have been before. See: Peter Gibbons and how his life is the worst its ever been, each new day.

After having spent far too long in an academic institution, whose administration was the most riddled with errors, incompetence, and bloat that I've ever encountered, this article makes me feel happy. It's not an easy problem, but at least someone notices.

Generation 0: each child kills 0 people on average.

Generation 1: each child kills 1 people on average. G0 comments that kids are killing more people these days.

Generation 2: each child kills 2 people on average. G1 comments that kids are killing more people these days.

Generation 3: each child kills 3 people on average. G2 comments that kids are killing more people these days.

Generation 3 points out that "lol people have been saying that forever. Nothing is happening. Our generation aren't that bad, because previous generations had the same narrative."

Please.

>This framework is designed to take into account a wide range of locations, individual conditions, and other data that can contribute to changing trends in sperm counts.

So, just count everyone and diminish the geographical factor in a problem. OK, let's ignore the problem until everyone is affected. Seems pretty un-legit.

It happens a lot in software, especially in the last half decade or so.

Suggest changing the title to "Only positive reinforcement [is permitted,] for researchers in some fields" for clarity.

If plenty of people are already doing it, why is the article titled with the question of whether we should start doing it?

It's because the article is talking about making it more of a primary source of nutrition. It isn't even the primary ingredient in sushi.

So, if the rich (and politicians) start eating it as a primary source of nutrition, then the commenter to whom you were replying might consider it similarly.

Fact Check: Not all free speech "absolutists" "excoriate" such things. Some of them have nearly always considered the context in which they're given to decide whether these kind of annotations indicate an actual fact-check, or, alternatively, a big flag that the post, podcast, or video might be something that contains genuinely interesting and informative content. Others enjoy seeing their oppressive opponents foisted upon their own petards, after the same tool did little to harm themselves to begin with, and then also seeing their opponents squeal in rage at how the turntables.

It looks to now have been removed. Update: it's back. You're a good man, Charlie Brown.

There are so few places anymore where you can't guess exactly what will be in the comments threads, and you go between feeling either frustrated or occasionally relieved to see someone who is open-minded. The few that popped up either seem to become echo chambers with their own biases, mysteriously disappear, or get flooded by organized campaigns to ruin the landscape.

That is what I myself ended up doing :)

In some areas, it would be necessary to somehow install trackers on your busses that you use. Depending on the jurisdiction, I've had to deal with busses either being possibly 10 minutes early, or missing their stop time by up to half an hour.