gnunez
Joined 12 years ago
Karma
52
Submissions
44
Member since
Jun 29
Joined 12 years ago
I guess if we really needed to, we could construct a deterministic agent harness. But in most use cases we probably want some chaotic behavior to increase our chances of stumbling on the desired results.
Thank you for the clarification
1. https://github.com/mistralai/mistral-inference/blob/main/src...
https://firmware-selector.openwrt.org/?version=21.02.3&targe... https://openwrt.org/toh/raspberry_pi_foundation/raspberry_pi https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/virtualization/qemu
But if we are seeing problems with agents replacing knowledge workers at the coding layer, why assume the executive layer is uniquely immune?
There was an interesting article in the Harvard Business Review about this exact problem. Researchers found that when LLMs are asked for strategic business advice, they tend to converge toward what is popular and trendy rather than necessarily what is best for the particular situation. They called this "trendslop," and described the response as,
"On strategy, LLMs might be more akin to a freshly minted MBA or junior consultant, parroting what's popular rather than what's right for a particular situation."
I really hope this idea works but just thought I'd share some of the research out there. https://archive.is/OPObK/again?url=https://hbr.org/2026/03/r...