glemion43

USA had this because it manufactured everything and got rich doing so.

NATO is / was USAs way of controlling Europe to have something against Asia.

It's time for us / Europe to let the USA being whatever and kicking them out

We (Germany) are quite well equipped making guns and tanks.

And btw it was our strategy to try to win over countries by NOT being the big bully but sure Russia and USA made it clear that this no longer works.

I hope USA leaves NATO and we kick them out sooner than later

That shocked me the most tbh

I had big hopes for one person until he copy pasted verbatim LLM responses to me...

It does.

If you have 1% of them and they cost you 50-100k per year than replacing them with computers make plenty of sense.

I know plenty of people who are shittier in writing code than Claude. People with real jobs who are expensive like 50-100k/year.

People whom you have to always handhold and were code review is fundamental.

You can write tests, pr gates etc.

It's still a scale in what you can let them do unsupervised vs controlling them more closely but already better than real people I know. Because they are also a lot faster.

If you have racing thoughts and some magic system responds to you and it's abstract enough (even people on hn do not know how LLMs work, plenty of them) then going for a walk is not enough...

'it uses grok' means what?

You clearly underestimate the quality of people I have seen and worked with. And yes guard rails can be added easily.

Security is my only concern and for that we have a team doing only this but that's also just a question of time.

Whatever LLMs ca do today doesn't matter. It matters how fast it progresses and we will see if we still use LLMs in 5 years or agi or some kind of world models.

I'm in hn for 10 years.

I spend too much time here and decided to delete my account to interact less.

It's partially working though

Being dismissive of technical terms on hn because something seems to be a hype is really weird.

It's the reason why I'm here because we discuss more technically about technology