gilcot

Another loser here to second you

And that’s not true! He did want to keep the editor stable and available for many platforms and compatible with vi. Rejected proposals break one of these rules.

Merci.

I loved using it to write and browse my html files. It can do troff too <3

No, the editor is "ex" (for extended ed…) and "vi" is it's other face… (when you call vi, it’s same as calling ex then issuing :visual command…)

And they're "codenames" not supposed to be as obvious as names…

That's because "ed" was the "editor" (and that later was abbreviated "ed"…) when sed born.

As unique as: Go, Python, R, Rust, Word, Writer, --"

And before the rise of heavy IDE, you need some coffee to write all those SomeObscureWord.longLongStuf.notSoShortOne.LastSentence()

Do you mean doas ?

and it's a dedicated release <3

Instead of comparing to LaTeX format, it should compare to ConTeXt…

You mean worst but successful 'cause of harsh marketing?

What about Octave and R, which are open source and for $0?