gepoch
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
Just have to remember that the year comes before the time zone but after the seconds :clown:
No idea where that came from. Probably the time format from the punchcard machine at bell labs.
If it was iso 8601 based, it would almost make sense.
01/02 03:04:05PM '06 -0700
So that's why it's in 2006, since you asked.
I think this is all totally fair. You are getting less laptop for the same price.
I will put a couple of nits here:
> * No dedicated GPU options, period.
It supports thunderbolt, so you can have an eGPU! That said, while eGPUs are pretty cool, they're expensive an inefficient.
> * Form factor is quite a bit more bulky than its competitors, even considering the fact parts are removable.
I would revise "quite a bit" down to "slightly." The Dell XPS is 15.28 mm thick. The Framework is 15.85mm thick. That's 0.57mm. It is on-par with the slimmer ultrabooks out there. I'm totally happy with the form factor.
* The magnetic bezel works great and I've had no problems with it at all. It's completely secure and you pretty much need to lever it off with your fingernail if you want to change it for a different color, or clean around the edge of your screen. The lid spring is slightly wobbly as others have reported, but not too bad.
* It does have thunderbolt and it works great. I've use mine with a Razer core x for gaming without issue. It also works with my Kensington dock.
Playing on easy modes is like walking. Once you build up some skill, playing on hard modes can feel like sprinting.
Additionally, Signal's encryption scheme gives their messages the "forward secrecy" property which means that acquiring key material at some point in the future does not allow you to decrypt any previous messages. Any encrypted messages that they could provide would be useless.
For more, check out their really interesting doc on the double ratchet algorithm that they use!:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullet_Cluster
Although that's a colliding pair of galaxy clusters. I'm not currently aware of any examples of this effect being observed for just two galaxies.
I searched for one of the unique tokens in the docs: https://www.google.com/search?q=0facda3319
That pulls up their SDK github repo: https://github.com/smartcar/node-sdk/blob/master/doc/readme....
Which is published with a standard MIT license: https://github.com/smartcar/node-sdk/blob/master/LICENSE.md
Which says (among other things): "Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software."
Which may have significantly complicated their copyright claim if Otonomo includes the MIT license and attribution to smartcar.. At the same time, I can't find Otonomo's docs anywhere.
Something to think about when setting up your GitHub license!