genidoi

15-20 sec into any of the demo recordings and I get the sense of 'noone is really there' from the AI responses. I guess it's to be expected from a v1 where the scope is prioritising how the demo conversation flows rather than its actual substance.

To admit having messed up they would need to include the full private key in the post, which they seem to have decided is still more embarrassing than not including it.

> And that skill is?

It is easy to argue otherwise, but to request a response in the form of a web app / embedded widget is at least some kind of AI proficiency that mirrors past experience having used a tool.

Even if you don't agree with the sentiment it's not hard to understand. The pace of AI improvement has strictly accelerated, and strict acceleration is likely going to be the way things go from here. To many, this means mourning a steadier future that is no longer likely to happen.

It's not a benchmark, it is a meme benchmark.

It’s obviously not about the cost of the parts, there just can’t be any tolerance for criminal conduct in government agency employees.

> RSI is obviously

There is no publicly known reference example of RSI, we have no idea how it works or what it does to the trajectory of progress?

No it’s not the same thing because one serves food, and the other facilitated academic fraud.

That approach doesn’t scale though.

Good code reliably transforms real world state in a desirable way.

It's probably quite difficult to manipulate per-user metrics after the data is collected.

Why would they have more spare capacity than Anthropic? Do you have a source for that?