garyfirestorm

You can’t have the first one without the second one. AI doesn’t create something out of thin air, it is only recreating from training data. Which is infringing portion of the argument.

Awareness and care is one thing. A unanimous action plan is another. Violation of privacy is not viewed through similar lens as say theft or other forms of crimes.

I should have phrased it differently. I can’t find a decent spec phone priced appropriately that I can add to cart and order it.

Not a single Linux OS phone I can buy today in US with all the basic features working.

Vibe-reverse-engineering

It didn’t generate a link (sources) when it claimed it was in stock

Not always. Many places will avoid hiring people to do the work instead they just contract it out. Saves them money in short term. Why hire someone at 100k, pay 401k, insurance, pto when I can simply buy it for 50k.

Also the first paragraph in github should explain what problem are you solving here. Is this like herdr but GUI?

It appears this guy is a low hanging fruit with previous cybercrime convictions that they grabbed to “send a message” to the group. But it doesn’t seem like they even know the identities of rest of the group members.

i generally go to the store where the coffee tastes better

Even bacteria are cultured ;)

Do you think the training process will retain these artifacts? I doubt it. If they were simply stealing the content - sure it would make sense - but I suspect they’re feeding it into training data and RL might distill these out.

> Second, you miscomprehended the article. The employee did not "threaten to ruin a prominent researcher's career"…

Proceeds to ask removal of another coauthor or else we totally discredit you - phrased as why would you do this to yourself.

Come on man, at least the example should be cached and presented in case the service is down

It’s a provision not circumvention, also not a hack. /s