garbawarb

All the named brands are the cheapest ones out there: the ones you expect to have the lowest quality because cheapness is what they optimize for. There's plenty of good quality chocolate out there, but like everything else, you have to pay more for it.

Wouldn't they also get layoff severance? Or was the amount significantly lower than tbe buyout would have been?

Why buy in your name?

I thought this would be about Doug Ford.

That's not true at all. The Bay Area is full of people with plenty of money but who don't care about aesthetics.

Of course the French like protesting more than most others but any country is susceptible to this: if the majority feels like their standard of living is slipping, a lot of them will start to consider proteating and violence.

I assume this is because of Muse? A lot of businesses block bots which stops Muse from being able to buy from those websites on a user's behalf. It seems like that'd be good for the businesses too.

Same. All these snacks have added sugar or oils, I'd rather have something simple.

I recommend Chesterton on everything.

Why rewrite the title to a lie? The article says DAU growth fell, this HN title says DAU fell.

Not true, we have infinite coastline.

Yes there is. You own a more valuable asset, so now even if you want to keep it you could take out a loan against it for a greater amount than if it hadn't appreciated.

Yes, these are literally the guidelines provided by the DOL. And the government seems to want to punish companies for following the exact published guidelines.

Lower expenses for the company means the shareholders profit more.

This is about these companies having the ability to sponsor employees for green cards. They can still employ people on visas. It's more accurate to say the government wants to prevent these workers from eventually becoming American.