gant

It depends. I've seen some shit on cheap bare metal providers, including getting ARP poisoned on Online.net.

Hetzner has been great overall. They've been very very helpful in documenting me reacting to abuse emails too when I got into some user-generated-content related legal trouble.

Running Kube on their cloud servers? Well have fun with that, the "vCore" is a very inconsistent unit unless you get their dedicated core servers. I moved back to Hetzner Bare Metal because you can't have anything that will push the resource boundaries on these boxes.

Also regarding Wireguard, I really like how tinc will find a new path and allows you to route over other nodes as needed. Wireguard can't really do that out of the box, every link is 1:1. You can of course setup something on top of that, but I miss the ease with which tinc does this.

We only use Azure for AD and still we get the leaky cloud everything is on fire screen once a week at least.

This goes both ways. Don't remember specifics, but contributors trying to "revoke" their license to destroy a FOSS project is about as common as a company trying to use your contributions in a only non-free version.

I am sort of a kubernetes person at work, and I just wasted 3 hours trying to get a cluster up with Rancher. Everything worked fine, except somehow the network started isolating namespaces and the nginx ingress couldn't reach my service.

So I'm calling it quits for now. Just running the cluster requires a small ops team.

Maybe your opinion is actually terrible, have you considered that? Not everything is a vocal minority, especially not if your scope is "all of OSS"

I mean I didn't call anyone a cracker, but would that offend you?

Thank you.

I feel like being active on GitHub definitely helped me getting my current job.

Regarding "wrongthink", it's generally a good idea to keep politics out of your professional GitHub account if you want to work at a place that may not align with your opinions. Or your opinions are spicy in general.

The sort of people that post on HN can usually pick their jobs, which is why I'm surprised someone here would want a job where they have to self-censor constantly. If that caveat applies to the vast majority of jobs for you maybe you should reevaluate your opinions?

Last I checked both articles have extensive "References" sections. Unless you actually like what you read, in that case I'll just have to deal with that. Unfortunate that stuck up people like you exist, but I'm not going to change that on this bastion of techbro-ism. (I know you people hate that word, so I made sure to use it)

Having a culture conscious of bias is good, but I'd rather see some progress before the end of the century. You know, cause old people exist and you can't really change this culture too fast, especially not if you factor in reactionaries that are sort of standing in the way and can't see the issue (hint: it's because you don't have the issue).