fyredge

I was not under the impression that it was a feature. I just googled the blackout and copied the first link to provide context. Could be a Spanish blog for all I care.

Emergency blackouts are a disruption for sure and I believe people were injured in that event, but the lesson I took from it is that nothing is more reliable than community. Technology comes and goes, but we will always have each other.

That was my first thought as well. With COVID, we recognised that WFH was viable for white collar work. Perhaps a global 2 week cleanse will allow everyone to re-evaluate life priorities outside of the internet.

I see hope in what happened during the blackout in Spain/Portugal.

The difference, I think, is that food costs money, but articles are essentially free. Human must eat, and we will eat what we can afford while making a decision based on the best value available. Articles are a luxury, so we become picky.

I single out articles because I know many people consume AI video slop when they are tired and just want to disengage, like eating junk food.

To that I disagree. It's not hell that you have to take care both. It's hell when you have to juggle them between a full time job that you need just to survive. Caring for family is a full time job. Unfortunately, it comes with no pay.

> My PhD bud, a Bernie supporter, thinks we should have put boots on the ground by now. I generally agree.

I suspect that this belief has the same level of thought put into it as the "general populace". The crux of the issue is not Iran's nuclear proliferation, it's the hegemon's unreliability.

The US had the JCPOA, had allies for deterrence, and unilaterally decided to discard them in the name of inflation. One might argue that the electorate has decided that the US should no longer be a hegemon, and yet the administration still impose it's will on others.

There was a time when I believed that Iran was not a rational actor. That is not the case now. I can only hope that there are enough checks and balances to prevent other actors from acting too irrationally.

have you thought through how you would even operationalize an unlimited ceiling on wealth accumulation?

I'm confused, your rebuttal to statistics is another anecdote? Was the quoted statistics limited to car commute or includes public transport? Your commute may be long, but it may not represent the average as well. Maybe it's a sign to switch away from cars instead?

Anecdotes are poor because it is highly context dependent. You had to make a long description of Harry to make your point, and yet it has not, to my mind, disproved the statistics, though I would like the source to the stats myself if you could provide it, thanks.

Is it any wonder that LLMs have been behaving the way they do? All the lying, cheating, manipulation, pitting man against machine are well documented in science fiction and think pieces. I haven't seen behaviour beyond those examples so far.

That statement demands an explanation.

As far as I'm aware, when reasoning does not meet reality, it is called a delusion, and I'm fairly certain that majority of humans are not delusional.

I hope this is rhetorical, because it has been raised since generative AI proliferated - you shouldn't.

I have a strong suspicion that this will be the true butlerian jihad of our world. We have already started seeing information silos in the form of discord groups. Social media users are increasingly privatising their pages, allowing access for known users only. Reddit is still surviving because of the large userbase there.

Based on the article, it's because Google (and presumably other search engines) did not surface the website, only LLMs crawled it.

Even if some LLMs discarded it, only they were the ones returning the results to users. Occam's razor tells me that LLMs cited the website and humans were too lazy to check. That the stats ended up being cited is a lack of scrutiny on both the LLMs and the human that should have reviewed it.

If the end goal of LLMs are autonomous agents, i.e. removing human oversight, then this will be what proliferates on the web.

Pay him no mind. I shiver at the thought that he might be at management level and passed potential hires because they didn't not disagree in the way he liked.

If anything, you dodged a bullet from a potential job where nothing gets done correctly.

What did Niemöller say again? First they came for...