frankenst1
Joined 6 years ago
Joined 6 years ago
Bitcoin accounts for <0.1% of global CO2e and has one of the highest shares of renewables in any industry (since it competes globally for the cheapest energy).
It incentivises renewables (by being a location agnostic buyer of first and last resort which buys all excess energy 24/7), reduces CO2e (by making it profitable to combust CH4 instead of venting it), stabilises energy grids (by providing flexible demand response, i.e. can be turned on and off at moment's notice), provides banking services for the global unbanked and financially discriminated, shields from gambling bankers and inflation of the money supply, ...
In comparison to all these use cases and benefits, mere "luxury" energy uses such as air-conditioning, tumble drying, video games, porn, ... all consume more energy and produce more CO2e (e.g. A/C ~100x more). Yet nobody calls to have the plug pulled on them.
Regulate the production of energy, not the consumption.
They report (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-022-01285-8/tables/1, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01285-8) e.g. the C allele of rs114142727 to have an OR of 1.285, yet they also report the frequency of said allele to be similar in the case and control group (both ~0.988). Is this a rounding issue (i.e. frequency in the case group must always be higher to report an OR>1) and the frequency is only slightly higher in the case group and the OR becomes so large simply because of the large sampling size? (40K case, 200K controls)
When they report 1.285 OR with a standard error of 0.04 at N=38691, does this roughly translate to a 95% CI of [1.207,1.363]?
~11% of the Bitcoin supply is held by exchanges, and it decreases on average by 2,500 BTC per day or ~5% per year (over the last 3 years).
Few actual need custodial services and nobody needs the greedy shitcoin casino. Decentralize. Be your own bank.
let zip = (as,bs) => as.slice(0, Math.min(as.length,bs.length)).map((a,i) => [a,bs[i]]);Bitcoin SV did not care about these things and is dead because of it. Its blocks are ~200MB spammed with mostly non-payment related data. Its blockchain has grown to over 6 TB, the global number of nodes verifying the chain is down to 20 and it has been delisted by many exchanges and block explorers.
Bitcoin and Lightning in comparison have ~25,000 nodes.
That is literally the purpose of building second layers. We don't need to keep on-chain records of every microtransaction and coffee purchase in an immutable, ever-growing blockchain synchronized across thousands of nodes across the globe.
> If I give you a bitcoin address, you can't send anything to me with the lightning network.
Sure I can. It is called a submarine swap.
In comparison, BCH has lost 80% of its transaction volume in the last year alone. Its blocksize is now 100KB on average and it now processes fewer transactions than LN. It also regularly hard-forks, either because of leadership cults (Ver, Wright, Sechet, ...) or because of scheduled hard-forks every 6 months which kick off all users who haven't updated. It's the opposite of stable and the market apparently does not share its determination in sacrificing decentralization for adoption.
Fiat:
- People unable to withdraw the money in Ukraine.
- Refugees being robbed of their live saving during their escape.
- Refugees unable to deposit/exchange Ukrainian currency.
vs
Bitcoin:
- Refugees being able to flee with their live savings safely stored by memorizing 12 words
- Refugees being able to access their savings in other countries simply by having access to a smart phone
- Ukraine being able to receive global donations while national banks being not operational.